Consider this: During his unanimous MVP season (2015-16), Curry’s on-court presence increased his teammates’ effective field goal percentage by an average of 4.5%. That doesn't sound massive until you realize that LeBron James, at his peak, hovered around 3%. Curry makes his teammates better not by passing the ball (though he is an excellent, underrated playmaker), but by simply existing on the court.
Peter Nicks’ Stephen Curry: Underrated answers that question not by focusing on the splashy highlights of the Warriors’ dynasty, but by zooming in on the quiet, painful decades of doubt that preceded the confetti. The result is a surprisingly emotional sports doc that functions less like a victory lap and more like a university thesis on perception, bias, and stubborn resilience. Stephen Curry- Underrated
The myth persists because of a single missed shot: the 2016 Finals, Game 7, the back-up three that rimmed out against Kyrie Irving’s dagger. That one miss—against a Cavs team that was statistically the best defensive performance of LeBron’s career—somehow defined a decade of "Curry chokes." Consider this: During his unanimous MVP season (2015-16),
Stephen Curry is underrated because he changed the sport so completely that we stopped giving him credit for it. The NBA is now a three-point shooting league; every team jacks up threes because Curry proved it wins championships. Because his style has been democratized across the league, his uniqueness is sometimes diluted in the eyes of casual viewers. That one miss—against a Cavs team that was
To build a strong case, you can cite these professional perspectives: Underrated by Stephen Curry | The Players' Tribune